Yakima
All commissioners kept the Yakama Nation intact
Democrats and Republicans divided on whether to make majority-minority CVAP district with Yakima Latino voters or split them between 14th & 15th
Republicans likely violate Voting Rights Act requirements
In Yakima County, commissioners listened to community and redrew the 14th and 15th legislative districts to improve Latino and Native representation. All four commissioners drew maps that brought together the previously split Yakama Reservation. However, Democrats drew a substantial majority-Latino CVAP district, while Republican commissioners drew only majority-white CVAP districts.
What this means is the maps from Republican Commissioners almost certainly violate Section 2 of the Federal Voting Rights Act. If either are approved, Latino voters could sue to create a majority Latino district in South Yakima County. Given Latino population growth in recent years, racial polarization in voting, and the highly segregated nature of Yakima County, experts suggest a Latino opportunity district must be measured by CVAP and should include the Yakama Nation in a minority coalition. As David Morales, attorney and local community advocate, put it, “Rather than submitting this plan for future lawsuits it would be beneficial to everyone and save a lot of time and money if the ultimate plan adhered to both the Voting Rights Act and the Federal Voting Rights Act.”
South King County
All commissioners opted for similar 11th and 37th districts with the exception of Fain, who drew Seattle’s Chinatown-International District outside the 37th district and parts of Newcastle and Bellevue into the Renton-Tukwila-based 11th district. The biggest difference was in the 47th district. Democrats drew maps that prioritized majority-minority representation in this rapidly diversifying region. Republicans carved the 47th district further east, fracturing any possible majority-minority district in South King County. To do this, they excluded a diverse Auburn and the Muckleshoot Nation while combining Seattle-area districts 43 and 36 with Bainbridge Island, splitting county boundaries in odd ways.
Snohomish
2020 census data showed growing diversity in Snohomish, prompting community members to advocate for the first-ever majority-minority district in the county with the 21st district. While no commissioner fulfilled that promise we’ll be lobbying for a majority-minority district in the upcoming public outreach meeting on October 5. It’s disappointing to see that every commissioner opted to keep in line with current district boundaries, which awkwardly connect working-class communities of color along the I-5 corridor with white, wealthy waterfront communities like Mukilteo and Edmonds. It’s even more disappointing to realize both Sen. Marko Liias and Rep. Strom Peterson live in those wealthy, white enclaves, which dilute the voting power of communities of color and the working-class. In this case, it seems both Democratic commissioners prioritized protecting the incumbents over empowering voters of color
And that’s the deep dive! It’s clear that our community voices are being heard loud and clear—but we’ve still got work to do to make sure these maps represent us. You can still get involved: sign up to testify with us at one of the final public hearings in early October (we’ll help you prep!!) And sign on to endorse our map proposals!