|
TABLE: Do you get the sense that it's not included in global food system debates as perhaps it should be?
TWL: I think you hit the nail on the head. I can only speculate as to why.
If you look at the countries and the political system of countries in Southeast Asia, they're all very closed. A lot have issues around their democratic governance. I don't want to use these massive brushstrokes around major regions but Southeast Asia tends to get forgotten because in some ways it's not conflict ridden in the same way, apart from Myanmar where I’m from. It's not affected by the same geopolitical forces as in Europe, the Americas and I guess Africa.
TABLE: You described land as a unifying challenge in the region, can you expand on this?
One similarity across almost all Southeast Asian countries is widespread poverty among farmers. And part of the reason is access to land. There's so much competition for land whether you're an agrarian country or you're a developed country. One of the reasons why Singapore is so laser focused on food tech is because it doesn't have the land it needs to grow its own food. And then in other countries you have conflict around land grabs and land use, ranging from farmland expansion, particularly for cash crops like palm oil and rubber. That then encroaches on land for food. Then you have a lot of big agri businesses in Cambodia, Thailand and Myanmar where they are very closely aligned with the political elite.
I would say it has become worse, particularly with the threat of climate change and the concern around global supply chains. People are trying to get access to as much land as possible.
This is a massive barrier to transforming food systems in these countries, particularly if you've got a small number of agribusinesses or owners that have access to a vast majority of the land and will be interested in focusing on cash crops, monoculture, and industrial scale agriculture.
Some economists think it's much more efficient for a small number of owners to have vast quantities of land. But it's also a recipe for communal conflict. It's a recipe for a continued focus on productivity versus nutrition versus environmental protection versus a more equitable access to land and livelihood and income.
TABLE: Finally, what are you optimistic about in Southeast Asia? What gives you hope?
TLW: Not the governments of Southeast Asia, but we have a new generation of journalists, activists, farmers and civil society organisations that I have met over the past few years. They are deeply engaged in these issues in a way that I have not seen in the past and despite all the challenges.
In Myanmar, there's currently a civil war going on because of a military coup in 2021. It's in a bad way in terms of nutrition and hunger. And yet, people that I have spoken to, the younger generation of people who grew up in Myanmar, deeply care about fairness and equality. They deeply care about the environment, they deeply care about biodiversity, and want to build a better country.
And I see the similarity at least in the younger generation of Thai, Indonesian and Filipino journalists and activists that I have met. So it's a bit of a cliché, but I'm hopeful that the new generation has a better grasp on things.
Click here to subscribe to Thin's weekly newsletter on food and climate, and where they meet.
|