Copy
 This week:  More people voted for Joe Biden ... A note to readers who say Trump won ... What does Fidel Castro have to do with the Georgia Senate race? ... Keep the coronavirus away from your Thanksgiving
A weekly note from the editor of 
 
Thank you for being a member. We couldn't do this without you.
(AP)

How we know Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential race

Since Election Day, we’ve fact-checked dozens of posts that misconstrue small errors in the ballot-counting process as evidence of a nationwide, Democrat-led voter fraud scheme to deny Donald Trump re-election. Both federal and local officials have said that’s not the case, but the claims have still proliferated on social media and among politicians and pundits.

Those claims are wrong — Joe Biden is the clear winner of the presidential race. Trump does not have a path to victory. This is not a matter of partisanship. It's a matter of facts.

PolitiFact crunched the numbers, looked at margins in key battleground states and looked into whether recounts and lawsuits could affect the election outcome. 

How do we know Biden won?

He won more votes. Here’s how we know that:

  • Each state is responsible for administering their own elections. In many states, this responsibility lies with the secretary of state, although counties and towns do most of the actual administration.

  • After voters cast their ballots, local election workers tabulate them at ballot-counting centers, where Republican, Democratic and nonpartisan challengers observe the process. Election officials then report vote tallies publicly on their websites. (Here are the vote counts for battleground states like Georgia and Pennsylvania.)

  • The Associated Press gathers those results directly from state or county officials and websites. Those results are then double-checked to make sure they’re accurate. 

  • Statisticians monitor those vote totals and see if either candidate has a clear path to victory. Once it’s clear that one candidate has enough votes to carry a state, news outlets will make a projection.

Those projections are not official results (more on that later), but they’re based on real votes reported by state election officials all over the country.

Biden needed 270 electoral votes to win the presidency and, based on vote counts reported by each state, he has passed that threshold

How big is Biden’s margin of victory?

It’s not huge, but it’s enough to put him in the White House.

For example, in Pennsylvania — the only swing state that Biden needs to win the presidency — unofficial results indicate that the former vice president was ahead of Trump by nearly 60,000 votes last week. Biden also leads in other battleground states, including Arizona, Michigan and Wisconsin, by tens of thousands of votes.

Election officials are still counting votes in some states, but most of the results are in and the margins are wide enough that Trump will not be able to make up the difference. Plus, most of the votes that are left to be counted are mail-in ballots, which Democrats tended to use more than Republicans.

What is the likelihood that recounts will make a meaningful impact on the presidential election?

Past recounts have resulted in a change of only hundreds of votes. For example, the most recent election recount in Wisconsin, in 2016, shifted the margin by 571 votes.

Biden finished ahead in Wisconsin by about 20,000 votes and led in Georgia by about 14,000 votes last week. It’s improbable that a recount would dramatically shrink those margins, much less hand the states to Trump.

Writing for the Wall Street Journal, Karl Rove, a Republican political consultant and lobbyist, said recounts will not overturn the election result.

"There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governor’s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election," Rove wrote. "The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day."

How does this compare to the Florida recount in 2000?

It doesn’t compare at all. 

The 2000 presidential election came down to one state, and the margin between George W. Bush and Al Gore was 537 votes. In the 2020 race, Trump would have to flip tens of thousands of votes in multiple states to have any shot at winning.

The controversy in Florida was not really about a recount, as most think it was, said Robert Speel, a political science professor at Pennsylvania State University who teaches the history of American elections. It was about ballots that weren’t counted in the first place.

"The punch card machines had registered no votes at all for about 170,000 Floridians, so Al Gore was requesting hand counts of those ballots. It’s very different from what’s happening now," he said. "There’s not hundreds of thousands of missing votes like in 2000."

Could Trump’s legal challenges affect the election outcome?

So far, there are no signs the Republicans will succeed in their efforts with the courts; Biden’s margins of victory are simply too large.

In some cases, Republicans sought to stop the counting of ballots or certification of results. In other cases, Republicans asked a judge to order changes related to ballot counting procedures, to review certain ballots or to demand closer access for observers. 

While some cases remain pending, the counting of ballots continued. 

Overall, the strategies are unlikely to erode the margins of Biden’s victory. Election experts say that they have seen no evidence of anything that would lead to the outcome of the presidential race being reversed and that Biden is the legitimate winner of the 2020 election.

Is there any evidence that votes were miscast or miscounted?

No.

In a Nov. 12 statement, a committee made up of U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency officials and its election partners said this election was "the most secure in American history." 

"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised," the agency wrote. "While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should, too."

When will the election results be final?

States have until Dec. 8 to certify their vote counts, but the Electoral College results won’t be finalized until Jan. 6.

Once states certify their results, electors are appointed. Electors are determined by the popular vote in each state. Political parties in each state choose potential electors before the general election, and voters choose them by voting for a presidential candidate.

State electors will meet Dec. 14 and cast their votes for president. Those results then make their way to Congress, which will count electoral votes in a joint session at 1 p.m. on Jan. 6. Ultimately, the vice president declares a winner, at which point the election is officially decided.

Daniel Funke and Samantha Putterman

Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward

A note to our readers who think President Trump won

Since the election, we’ve heard from many readers who are disappointed with our fact-checking work on the election results. Here are a few of the comments we’ve received.

  • “As usual you lie. There are countless election poll watchers who have given sworn affidavits in illegal activities at the polls.  You are so far left-wing that you can't see the forest for the trees.”

  • “I do not know why I bother with you. You are a puppet for the Democrats. No fraud????? How about Arizona? Can you read?”

  • “And what if Trump had WON?? The Democrats would be doing the same thing and as AOC promised there would be rioting in the streets and anarchy!!”

  • “How could the truth be any more obvious?  President Trump is way more popular than in his first election. There is no way he could have lost this time in a legitimate election.”

  • “Why are you opposed to a recount or legal intervention?  ... Those of us who support Trump are fully supportive of his actions. Are you afraid of finding out the truth?  I would think you would want to legally check into possibilities of election fraud.”

It's an unfortunate product of these polarized times that information deemed unfavorable toward a candidate is perceived as partisan. Our role is not to make any candidate look good — and it’s certainly not to help any candidate win an election. It's to help you navigate a confusing information landscape and make sure you have access to accurate information.

We do take election fraud seriously, and we have checked out many statements over the years. This year, we haven’t seen evidence to support those claims. In fact, this election has been the most scrutinized of any we’ve seen in our 13 years of fact-checking. 

It wouldn’t be right for us to report election results as in dispute when they’re not, or to say that a winner isn’t clear when it is. We would apply these same standards if the situation were reversed and Trump was leading Biden in the public vote counts.

We hope you’ll keep reading PolitiFact, even if you dislike our findings. A democracy depends on people being able to consider evidence and then deliberate on the best path forward. 

— Angie Drobnic Holan, Editor-in-chief 

Fact-checks of the week

  • Vote in 2020 was declared secure. U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., said, "We heard from the Department of Homeland Security ... that this was probably the most secure election that’s ever been run in the United States.” We rated that True. On Nov. 12, 2020, officials from two Department of Homeland Security committees released a joint statement to that effect. It’s normal for states with close contests to launch ballot recounts to allow for correction of mistakes, the statement says, but there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in any way compromised.

  • No, Facebook didn’t downgrade President Trump. A post claims, "Facebook removed the title of ‘President’ from Donald Trump and designated him as ‘Political Candidate.’" We rated that False. Archived versions of the Facebook page show that Trump has had a ‘political candidate’ designation for months, as far back as at least Jan. 15, 2020. Facebook did not change the designation after Biden won the election.

  • Fidel Castro at issue in Georgia Senate race. Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., made this claim in a Nov. 10 tweet: "@ReverendWarnock celebrated Fidel Castro & welcomed him to his church. It’s another example of what we’ve been saying all along: He’s the most dangerous and radical candidate in America." We rated this Mostly False. Democratic candidate Raphael Warnock, now the pastor of a church in Atlanta, was the youth pastor at a New York City church when Castro spoke there in 1995. We found no evidence that Warnock celebrated or welcomed Castro or that he was involved in arranging his appearance.

The uninvited guest: How to keep the coronavirus out of Thanksgiving

With small indoor gatherings driving a record surge of new coronavirus cases across the U.S., public health officials are worried about the holiday season accelerating a worsening situation.

Thanksgiving comes at a difficult time in the pandemic. Hospitals across the U.S. are being overwhelmed by new COVID-19 patients. The country is setting daily infection records, and more than 1,000 COVID-19 deaths are being reported on average each day.

Here are the important things to know: 

  • The safest way to celebrate Thanksgiving during the coronavirus pandemic is to spend the day at home with members of your immediate household, experts said.

  • If you’re planning on getting together in person with family and friends from outside of your immediate household, you should consider isolating as soon as possible.

  • In-person gatherings should be kept small and short, with attendees keeping their distance, wearing masks, and taking as many other precautions as they can.

  • Researchers developed a tool that can help you assess the likelihood that somebody at your gathering will be carrying the coronavirus.

Read our full story on how to celebrate the holidays during the coronavirus.

Bill McCarthy

Do you smell smoke? 

Here's your Pants on Fire fact-check of the week: 
No, a member of Joe Biden’s COVID-19 task force does not recommend “withholding food stamps and rent assistance from those who refuse coronavirus vaccines.”

See what else we've rated Pants on Fire this week. 
Have questions or ideas for our coverage? Send me an email at holan@politifact.com. Put “Fact-checking” in the subject line.

Thanks for reading!

Angie Drobnic Holan 
PolitiFact Editor-in-Chief 
Send this link to your friends so they can sign up for this email! Send this link to your friends so they can sign up for this email!
Copyright © 2020 PolitiFact, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.